Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Wash. App. 778 - State v. Bilal

54 Wash. App. 778 - State v. Bilal’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2013

14 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bibby v. United States · Adams v. Fulcomer · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he following additional times shall be added to [any drug offense] sentence if the offender or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We recognize that in most crimes involving the use of deadly weapons, the coparticipants are aware that one or more of them is armed. That is no reason, however, for imposing strict liability [of penalty enhancements] on all coparticipants without regard to each participant's knowledge that another is so armed. Such strict liability was possible under the old accomplice liability statute ... The new complicity statute, by contrast, makes an accomplice equally liable only for the substantive crime—any sentence enhancement must depend on the accused's own misconduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Ensure that the punishment for a criminal offense is proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history; "(2) Promote respect for the law by providing punishment which is just; "(3) Be commensurate with the punishment imposed on others committing similar offenses; "(4) Protect the public; "(5) Offer the offender an opportunity to improve him or herself; and "(6) Make frugal use of the state's resources.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.