Appelwick v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
540 F.2d 404 · 1976
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2018
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Roth v. Laird · United States ex rel. Hutcheson v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon receipt of active duty orders any reserve officer and/or his employer may submit a request for a delay in entrance on active duty and/or exemption from active duty to a board authorized by the military department concerned to consider such cases.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(t)his statutory and administrative pattern appears to give the (military department) the power to establish whatever substantive guidelines it deems desirable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“However, an interpretation which is 'plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation' must be reversed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.