United States v. Paulton’s Empirical Analysis
540 F.2d 886 · 1976
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably State v. Burge (1985), State v. Mitchell (1983)
18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · Keeble v. United States · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Zanfardino v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not material that the checks may not have been delivered on the exact dates appearing thereon or that particular employees may not have cashed their checks immediately after receiving them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Gay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.