Jenkins v. Winter’s Empirical Analysis
540 F.3d 742 · 2008
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Gallagher v. Magner ex rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement (2010), United States v. Lozoya (2010)
38 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Smith v. St. Louis University · Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Claims not raised in an opening brief are deemed waived.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This court does not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal in a reply brief unless the appellant gives some reason for failing to raise and brief the issue in his opening brief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 56(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires affidavits to be `made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McNeil v. Metro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.