Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

540 F. App'x 162

United States v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2013

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2013-09-26

Decided 2013-09-26

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Joseph Allen Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1 (E.D.Va. May 2, *1632013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/540/fappx/162 · .json · Public domain