Daymude v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2014
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 5103
Relies on Corder v. State · Williams v. Johnson · State v. Odenbrett · State v. Andring · 133 Ind. App. 347 - Baker v. Whittaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"As part of Channon's treatment, the court-approved petition required that Daymude, his wife and Channon participate in family counseling. Further, the petition provided that if Daymude failed to follow the treatment program, the 'matter may be referred to the Department of Public Welfare or the Prosecutor for formal Court proceedings. Thus, a-though the trial court technically did not order Daymude to participate in the counseling, Daymude did participate under the threat of court action. The issue set forth in our opinion correctly characterized the above facts. Accordingly, our decision remains the same."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sims v. State“x x # * x x (8) a: (A) licensed social worker; (B) Heensed clinical social worker; (C) licensed marriage and family therapist; (D) licensed mental health counsel- or; (E) lHcensed addiction counselor; or (F) licensed clinical addiction counselor; and a client of any of the professionals described in clauses (A) through (F); Pa ip ig * is not a ground for exeluding evidence in any judicial proceeding resulting from a report of a child who may be a victim of child abuse or neglect or relating to the subject matter of the report or failing to report as required by IC 31-38.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. J.B. v. E.B.“* * * * * * (3) a: (A) licensed social worker; (B) licensed clinical social worker; (C) licensed marriage and family therapist; (D) licensed mental health counselor; (E) licensed addiction counselor; or (F) licensed clinical addiction counselor; and a client of any of the professionals described in clauses (A) through (F); * * * * * * is not a ground for excluding evidence in any judicial proceeding resulting from a report of a child who may be a victim of child abuse or neglect or relating to the subject matter of the report or failing to report as required by IC 31-33.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jb v. Eb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.