Emerick v. Buchonok’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1990
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. Crum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Emerick's denial of entry [on December 27, 1982,] to a building he had agreed to purchase has some color of right, since he had been allowed by the owner, Bu-chonok, to take possession without consummating the transfer of title. Therefore, denial of entry under color of right doesn't establish Emerick's intent to take Buchonok's tools on December 27. La ter, the negotiations between Buchonok and Emerick's attorneys established the right to possession to the building only. When Emerick left with Bucho-nok's tools, the tort was manifestly established without a doubt, but until December 30, no tort could be clearly established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Buchonok v. Emerick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.