540 So. 2d 1373 - Sharp v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 477 So. 2d 350 - Clardy v. Capital City Asphalt Co. · In Re Morphis · 355 So. 2d 687 - Milford v. Tenn. River Pulp & Paper Co. · Langston v. State · W. F. Matney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) Actual annexation to the realty or to something appurtenant thereto; (2) Appropriateness to the use and purposes of the part of the realty with which it is connected; (3) The intention of the party making the annexation, of making permanent attachment to the freehold. This intention of making the annexation is inferred; (a.) From the nature of the articles annexed; (b.) The relation of the party making the annexation; (c.) The structure of and mode of annexation; (d.) The purposes and uses for which the annexation has been made."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.