540 So. 2d 201 - Farias v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 494 So. 2d 1143 - Lambrix v. State · Hialeah, Inc. v. Bell · Davis v. Florida · Rutherford v. Securities & Exchange Commission · 475 So. 2d 682 - Florida Bar Standard Jury Instructions Civil 85-1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is error for a court to force a party to exhaust his peremptory challenges on persons who should be excused for cause since it has the effect of abridging the right to exercise peremptory challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.