Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 540 SO2D 769 - Cable v. State

Cable v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Matlock · Kimmelman v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Factors relevant to this determination include the circumstances under which the defendant came into custody, the defendant's awareness of the right to withhold consent, the defendant's performance of cooperative acts, the defendant's age, intelligence, and education, and the nature of police behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.