Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ex Parte Chambers · Charles Coleman, Cross-Appellee v. State of Alabama, Cross-Appellant · United States v. French
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The petitioner is entitled to have his guilty plea set aside. ‘Even in the case of a negotiated plea, our higher courts require that the accused be informed of the correct range of maximum and minimum penalties.’ McClaren v. State, 500 So.2d 1325, 1327 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). ‘[A] defendant is constitutionally entitled to have information concerning the range of punishment prescribed by the act to which he may be sentenced and the consequences of the conviction at the time he enters his plea.’ Coleman v. Alabama, 827 F.2d 1469, 1473 (11th Cir.1987). A defendant cannot make a voluntary plea of guilty with full knowledge of its effects if he has not been properly advised of the correct range of punishment. Coleman, supra; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). ‘Without accurate and complete information at the plea bargaining stage, a defendant is unable to make a voluntary and informed plea.’ United States v. French, 719 F.2d 387, 389 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clemons v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.