540 So. 2d 898 - Junco v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1120 - Murray v. State · 487 So. 2d 1043 - State v. Thomas · 493 So. 2d 454 - Rease v. State · 529 So. 2d 772 - Waldron v. State · 523 So. 2d 726 - Harrison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where convictions arise from separate incidents occurring at separate times and places, consecutive sentences may be imposed without giving reasons for enhancement. Since the twenty-three counts on which defendant was sentenced include both 'same incident’ and ‘separate incident’ convictions (without any distinction having been indicated), we conclude that resentencing is necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Junco v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.