Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 540 S.W.2d 314 - Chudleigh v. State

Chudleigh v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2011

15 state decisions

8019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shappley v. State · Balli v. State · Potter v. State · Daniels v. State · McBride v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We, the Jury, having found the defendant, Lloyd A. Goehring, ‘Guilty as Charged in the Indictment,’ assess his punishment by confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for a period of 7 years, and in addition to such confinement, assess a fine of $5,000; we further find from the evidence that the defendant has never been convicted of a felony in this or any other state, and we do recommend that the imposition of his sentence be suspended and that he be placed on probation under the further orders of this court. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.