Ex Parte Hammond’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1993
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jurek v. Texas · Jurek v. State · Ex Parte Wilson · Carey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society; and (2) in cases in which the jury charge at the guilt or innocence phase permitted the jury to find the defendant guilty as a party under sections 7.01 and 7.02, Penal Code, whether the defendant actually caused the death of the deceased or did not actually cause the death of the deceased but intended to kill the deceased or another or anticipated that a human life would be taken.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Shippy v. State · Ex Parte Graves““The term ‘proof is evident’ means that the evidence is clear and strong, leading a well-guarded and dispassionate judgment to the conclusion that the offense of capital murder has been committed; that the accused is the guilty party; and that the accused will not only be convicted but that the jury will return findings which will require a sentence of death.” Ex parte Wilson, 527 S.W.2d 310 (Tex.Cr. App.1975), and cases there cited; Ex parte Derese, 540 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.Cr. App.1976); Ex parte Hammond, 540 S.W.2d 328 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Arthur Ott“1. Whether the conduct of McKenzie that caused the death of the deceased was committed deliberately and with the reasonable expectation that the death of the deceased John Turner would result; 2. Whether there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKenzie v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.