Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 540 SW3D 107 - Lynch v. Lynch

Lynch v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc. · Worford v. Stamper · Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp. · Bocquet v. Herring · Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. Heine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because we do not know what value the trial court assigned to the community property assets or the percentage of the property awarded to each party, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in dividing the community property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Mischaracterization of community property as separate property is harmful and requires reversal only if the mischaracterization affects the just and right division of the community estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Pace makes no argument as to why the property division is unfair or unjust apart from the alleged mischaracterization. In short he has failed to conduct a harm analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.