In re Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 28 U.S.C. § 1930 (§ 246 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))
Relies on Sampson v. Murray · Michigan Coalition of Radioactive Material Users, Inc. v. Griepentrog · In the Matter of Forty-Eight Insulations Incorporated Appeal of Maritime Asbestos · Service Employees International Union Local 1 v. Husted · Baker v. Adams County/Ohio Valley School Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]rdinarily, a party must move first in the bankruptcy court for ... a stay of a judgment, order, or decree of the bankruptcy court pending appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] court's decision to [grant or] deny a [stay pending appeal] is highly discretionary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the likelihood that the moving party will be irreparably harmed absent a stay,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.