Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. The Bohack Corporation, Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Honorable Jacob Mishler, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York’s Empirical Analysis
541 F.2d 312 · 1976
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably In Re Booth (1982), Allegaert v. Perot (1977)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Cardillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The argument is made that to allow picketing in the case of this financially troubled debtor is to put it out of business. That is, unfortunately, sometimes the sad outcome when a union and an employer cannot come to terms. But the policy of our labor laws is simply to provide rules for the handling of labor disputes, not to prohibit the use of economic power in the resolution of such disputes. By filing under Chapter XI an employer does not become clothed in immunity from union action.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Upon the filing of a petition, the court may, in addition to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties conferred and imposed upon it by this chapter- (1) permit the rejection of executory contracts of the debtor, upon notice to the parties to such contracts and to such other parties in interest as the court may designate;””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court did not have jurisdiction, ... to enjoin the picketing or other lawful union activity, and hence (we) will grant the writ of mandamus to the district court to dissolve any such order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.