United States v. Ong’s Empirical Analysis
541 F.2d 331 · 1976
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Gallo (1985), United States v. Friedman (1988)
37 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Brown v. United States · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the total cross-examination was sufficient to afford the jury a basis to evaluate the defense theory.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although ordinarily there are few subjects more potentially inflammatory than narcotics and thus such evidence should usually be excluded in a non-narcotic trial, we believe that in the total circumstances of this case, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in admitting the challenged conversation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.