Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 F.2d 814 - Homeowners Emergency Life Protection Committee v. Lynn

Homeowners Emergency Life Protection Committee v. Lynn’s Empirical Analysis

541 F.2d 814 · 1976

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2002

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flint Ridge Development Company v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma a Hills · Ely v. Velde · Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Coleman · City of Boston v. Volpe · San Francisco Tomorrow v. Romney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In accordance with the customary rule of statutory construction, expressio unius est exclusio alterius, this would indicate that in expressly making only one section retroactive, Congress intended all other sections to be operative only from the effective date of the Act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Should the further construction of Los Angeles Dam and Reservoir be en joined pending a determination of the adequacy of the Federal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and (2) Whether the EIS itself is adequate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.