← 541 F.2d 832 - Mandujano v. Basic Vegetable Products, Inc.

Mandujano v. Basic Vegetable Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

541 F.2d 832 · 1976

Citation profile

cited by 98 later decisions

states following

April 2016

most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Weinberger v. Kendrick (1982), Cotton v. Hinton (1977)

48 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour · Barrett v. Zweibon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[s]uch findings of fact and conclusions of law as may be necessary to support the response must also appear on the record.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 41 Cal. 3d 460 - State of California v. Levi Strauss & Co. · Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
“exists the risk that the interests of some class members may be sacrificed in the effort to achieve the `greatest good for the greatest number.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. EEOC v. Com. of Pa. · Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Commission
“proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given to all members of the class in such manner as the court directs”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee · Fowler v. Birmingham News Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.