Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 F.3d 1077 - Turner v. Burnside

Turner v. Burnside’s Empirical Analysis

541 F.3d 1077 · 2008

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2023 · most notably Ross v. Blake (2016), Albino v. Baca (2014)

15 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

640200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Darby v. Cisneros · Dixon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the court looks to the factual allegations in the defendant's motion to dismiss and those in the plaintiff's response, and if they conflict, takes the plaintiff’s version of the facts as true. If, in that light, the defendant is entitled to have the complaint dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, it must be dismissed.... If the complaint is not subject to dismissal at the first step, where the plaintiff’s allegations are assumed to be true, the court then proceeds to make specific findings in order to resolve the disputed factual issues related to exhaustion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “looks to the factual allegations in the defendant's motion to dismiss and those in the plaintiff's response, and if they conflict, takes the plaintiff's version of the facts as true.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Remedies that rational inmates cannot be expected to use are not capable of accomplishing their purposes and so are not available”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.