Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 F.3d 1175 - Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.

Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

541 F.3d 1175 · 2008

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably CQ, Inc. v. TXU Mining Co., L.P. (2009), R & R Sails, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (2012)

6 federal appellate · 5 district ·

270200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Wong v. Regents of the University of California · Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture · National Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance · Schneider v. County of San Diego · Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial, unless the failure was substantially justified or is harmless.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any local rule requiring a conference prior to the court's imposition of sanctions under Rule 37(c) would be inconsistent with Rule 37(c) and, therefore, unenforceable”). . The Court is similarly unpersuaded by SFR’s contention that sanctions should not be imposed because Nationstar's counsel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “self-executing, automatic sanction to provide a strong inducement for disclosure of material.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.