Rodriguez v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
541 F.3d 1180 · 2008
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3264 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 4046
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Reno v. Koray · Lopez v. Davis · Woodall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons · United States v. Latimer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) any statement by the court that imposed the sentence— (A) concerning the purposes for which the sentence to imprisonment was determined to be warranted; or (B) recommending a type of penal or correctional facility as appropriate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“pointedly discussed the absence from the statutory language of any criteria the [agency] could use in applying the statute,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n agency's authority to promulgate categorical rules is limited by clear congressional intent to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.