Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 F.3d 158 - Schipani v. McLeod

Schipani v. McLeod’s Empirical Analysis

541 F.3d 158 · 2008

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · Ruotolo v. City of New York · Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n a diversity case, state law governs the award of prejudgment interest but in contrast, postjudgment interest is governed by federal statute,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.