Miner v. Clinton County’s Empirical Analysis
541 F.3d 464 · 2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Dusenbery v. United States · Jones v. Flowers · McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. · Weigner v. City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“some hard evidence showing that its version of the events is not wholly fanciful[.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'An issue of fact is genuine if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party. A fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'adverse treatment of individuals compared with other similarly situated individuals' based on religion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.