Sharkey v. Quarantillo’s Empirical Analysis
541 F.3d 75 · 2008
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States ex rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp. (2010), Conyers v. Rossides (2009)
27 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1155 (§ 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Neitzke v. Williams · Califano v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]wo conditions must be satisfied for agency action to be final: First, the action must mark the consummation of the agency’s decisionmaking process — it must not be of a merely tentative or interlocutory nature. And second, the action must be one by which rights or obligations have been determined or from which legal consequences will flow.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only upon a showing of 'clear and convincing evidence' of a contrary legislative intent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saget v. Trump · Saget v. Trump“statutory limitations on judicial review of agency action should be interpreted narrowly in light of the APA's strong presumption in favor of judicial review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.