541 F. Supp. 2d 1319 - Diaz v. Cobb’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973A (§ 3 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973G (§ 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)
Relies on Dunn v. Blumstein · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Storer v. Brown · Bullock v. Carter · Burdick v. Takushi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Supreme Court has not subjected registration guidelines to the strict scrutiny test. Instead, it has consistently treated them as reasonable, nondiscriminatory restrictions subject to a relaxed standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the State's important regulatory interests are generally sufficient to justify”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ability of Floridians to register to vote.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.