State v. Bookwalter’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably State v. Whittaker (1997), State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones (2014)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neal v. State of California · State v. Johnson · State v. Reiland · Kochevar v. State · State v. Norris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state, the person may be punished for only one of the offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them. All the offenses, if prosecuted, shall be included in one prosecution which shall be stated in separate counts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of [Minn.Stat. § 609.035] is “to limit punishment to a single sentence where a single behavioral incident result[s] in the violation of more than one criminal statute.” Thus, if a defendant commits multiple offenses against the same victim during a single behavioral incident, Minn.Stat. § 609.035 provides that the defendant may be sentenced for only one of those offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“the multiplicity and disjointed nature of events between the sexual assault and the attempted murder” — in concluding that the defendant did not attempt to murder the victim in order to avoid apprehension for sexually assaulting her). . Following our decision in Jackson , the Legislature amended Minn.Stat. § 244.10 to add a provision stating,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.