Krank v. Krank’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2020
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Leidholm · Heck v. Reed · Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C. · Ryan v. Flemming · Schmidkunz v. Schmidkunz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"When domestic violence is a factor in a custody decision, the court `shall cite specific findings of fact.' NDCC § 14-09-06.2(1)(j). Rule 52(a), NDRCivP, also requires trial courts to `find the facts specially.' Findings are especially important in cases involving domestic violence, because the presence of findings on the issue shows that the trial court did not ignore the issue in reaching its conclusion. Helbling, 532 N.W.2d at 653."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hile separation may be more successful than rehabilitation in ceasing the violence, separation `does not change the psychological characteristics of the parties.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gietzen v. Gabel“It is common for domestic abuse to occur as a stage in a cycle of violence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whalen v. Whalen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.