State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1997
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers · Arndt v. Griggs · Clark v. City of Titusville · 36 Cal. 2d 136 - Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of Bakersfield · Davis v. Ogden City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The county derives its power to enact an occupation tax ordinance from § 17-5-27, U.C.A., 1953, which confers authority to license, for the purpose of revenue, all and every kind of business, where such action is not prohibited by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All that is required, under the Fourteenth Amendment, is equality among members of each class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MLC“[b]y its express terms, the ordinance is a revenue measure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.