Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 P2D 1361 - Anderson v. Pickering

Anderson v. Pickering’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1990
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Strange v. Hicks · Commercial Lumber Co. v. Nelson · Romans v. Shannon · Scott v. Norris · Swisher v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The third contention, that the titles were merchantable by virtue of the Merchantable [sic] Title Act, is not applicable here. The authorities which plaintiffs cite concern actions to quiet title. No authority has been found and none has been cited which would require a vendor to purchase real property where there is a defective title. The Merchantable [sic] Title Act provides a method through which title may be quieted statutorily. It is not self-executing, nor does it provide a perfect remedy for every instance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.