¶1The trial court correctly determined the merits of this case by summary judgment for the defendant. There is no basis, however, for deducting from the amounts admittedly due the plaintiff his alleged “pro rata share of the expenses” involved either in collecting the funds in question or in attorney’s fees. The provision for a set-off for these amounts as provided in paragraph 1(0 is stricken from the final judgment which is otherwise affirmed.
541 So. 2d 166
541 So.2d 166
14 Fla.L.Weekly 903
Schler v. Weiss
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-04-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1989
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-04-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →