State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar · 389 So. 2d 1271 - State v. Langendorfer · 390 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Ramos · 513 So. 2d 1237 - Oreck v. Oreck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Joseph who testified for the first time on rebuttal. He testified that he was not at the crime scene and had not kicked a knife away from the victim's hand. In an attempt to impeach Joseph, the defense called Gary Eldridge as a witness for the purpose of exposing prior inconsistent statements made by Joseph. It was this surrebuttal testimony by a defense witness that the court of appeal found to be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harrison“"The prosecution has the right to rebut the evidence adduced by the defendant, but the defendant is without right to rebut the prosecution's rebuttal."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.