Muggins v. Neeley’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. Sealy · 477 So. 2d 374 - Harris v. Meadows · Nelson Bros., Inc. v. Busby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[I]t is an established rule that a jury verdict cannot be set aside merely because the jury could have drawn different conclusions from conflicting evidence. As this Court stated in Harris v. Meadows, 477 So.2d 374 (Ala.1985):”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.