541 So. 2d 554 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on 396 So. 2d 66 - Escambia Chemical Corp. v. United Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A qualified domestic relations order is defined [in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ERISA)] at 29 U.S.C.A. § 1056 (d)(3)(B)(i) and provides that the alternate payee can be assigned the right to receive all or a portion of the benefits payable to a participant under a plan `only if such order does not require a plan to provide any type or form of benefit, or any option, not otherwise provided under the plan.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.