Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 SO2D 744 - State v. Mathis

State v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2002

5 state decisions

20198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 482 So. 2d 388 - State v. Collins · 482 So. 2d 578 - State v. Taylor · 475 So. 2d 255 - State v. Bentley · 481 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Holcomb · 476 So. 2d 331 - Merchant v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he provocation was not legally sufficient to warrant a finding that defendant had acted in self-defense. [However], provocation can be a permissible reason for downward departure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.