541 So. 2d 772 - Reyes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · 177 Ind. App. 432 - Mills v. State · State v. Barrett · 328 So. 2d 16 - State v. Gieseke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The opportunity and possible motivation for misconduct arise because of the confidential informant's knowing participation in the controlled purchase. Those considerations are not present where, as here, a person unknowingly assists the police.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“who may be motivated to implicate innocent third persons in order to gain favor with the police, or for reasons personal to the informant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.