State v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Tripp v. Harryman (1981), Morrow v. Wyrick (1981)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stephens v. Kansas City Gas Company · Pedigo v. Roseberry · State v. Dennison · Jones v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. Louis · State v. Medley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can hardly be said to reflect the 'role of an active advocate in behalf of his clients.' " Id. at 663 n.4. 7 33 Petitioner also argues that he implicitly raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the introductory part of his pro se petition. Petitioner urges the court to read the petition liberally. We have done so. The reference therein to ineffective assistance of counsel is related to petitioner's work product or attorney-client privilege claim. See note 6 supra. Even reading the petition liberally, we cannot agree that petitioner implicitly raised a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel with regard to petitioner's state appellate counsel. The district court cannot be faulted for failing to address a claim raised for the first time before this court. 34 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. * The Honorable Marion T. Bennett, Judge, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation 1 The Honorable John F. Nangle, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri * Ms. Montefelice was employed at the Public Defender's Bureau and Ms. Stowers by the Parole Office. Both were regularly required to record such testimony for their respective offices 2 "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrow v. Wyrick“[T]he certificate of death [is] prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, but it is given no greater force than any other prima facie evidence of that fact. Death, like any other fact, may be shown by many types of circumstantial or direct evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“wherein and why the rulings sought to be reviewed are claimed to be erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrow v. Wyrick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.