Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 541 SW3D 167 - Hallmark v. State

Hallmark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler))

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Rezac v. State · Broxton v. State · Proctor v. State · Euziere v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “state the grounds for the ruling sought by the complaining party with sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware of the complaint, unless the specific grounds are apparent from the context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.