In Re Sandground’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2010
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Reback · In Re Hutchinson · Matter of Haupt · Matter of Smith · In Re Rosen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We might consider Sandground’s inconsistent positions before the Board to be an aggravating factor, but defer to the Board's treatment of this matter.” Id. at 1247-48 n. 10. 10 . The client’s wife found the secret agreement in her husband's papers after new counsel had taken over for Sandground. Id. 11 . Sandground advised his client to reveal the funds at any deposition. Id. at 1245 . 12 . In Sandground , the Hearing Committee did not accept in full Bar Counsel’s position that there was a preconceived conspiracy to conceal the information, finding only that Sandground”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Shay“the nature of the violation, [(2)] the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, [(3)] the need to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Sandground's knowing participation went to the heart of the controversy between [his client] and his wife and threatened to defraud [the wife].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.