Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 F.2d 403 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

542 F.2d 403 · 1976

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
5
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably United States v. McNeese (1990), United States v. Ruggiero (1984)

82 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

50019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 4244

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Bullock v. United States · Babich v. United States · Aldridge v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such circumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unenhanced by tangible impairment of the defense function and unsupported by a better showing on the other factors than was made here, does not alone make out a deprivation of the right to [a] speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ ‘[a]lmost every jury trial requires some compromise with standards of absolute perfection; such deviations must be tolerated if the jury system is to function effectively.’ ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.