Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 F.2d 460 - Kevin Donald Pope v. Maurice H. Sigler, Etc.

Kevin Donald Pope v. Maurice H. Sigler, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

542 F.2d 460 · 1976

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 1994
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1994

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

120197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Willis v. Ciccone · Lee v. United States · Kortness v. United States · United States v. White · McCoy v. United States Board of Parole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The district judge, in sentencing under section 4205(b)(2), has an objective expectation: (1) that the prisoner will be given meaningful parole consideration at or before the one-third point of his sentence, and (2) that the prisoner’s institutional conduct and rehabilitation will be major factors in the Parole Board’s determination. . . . (T)he Parole Board must exercise its discretion in a manner consistent with the federal Constitution, applicable statutes, its own published rules, and the mandate given it by the sentencing judge at the time of sentencing. Part of the sentencing judge’s mandate is fulfillment of his objective expectations regarding meaningful consideration of parole applications of prisoners sentenced under section 4205(b)(2).” Id. at 941, 942 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.