Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
542 F.2d 941 · 1976
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1996
13 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Tucker · Strunk v. United States · United States v. Jones · United States v. Woodall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(A)n assertion that a plea is invalid because it was not made intelligently with knowledge of the consequences, waives an objection that such evidence is privileged. United States v. Woodall, 5 Cir. 1970, 438 F.2d 1317 , cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 .” Johnson v. United States, 542 F.2d 941, 942 (5 Cir.1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vest v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.