Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 F.2d 98 - In Re Leonard L Bianchi

In Re Leonard L Bianchi’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1995

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

80197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · United States v. Bryan · United States v. Alter · United States v. Sacco · United States v. Chevoor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requirement that every sovereign, state or federal, recognize immunity granted by another sovereign, Murphy v. Waterfront Commission, 378 U.S. 52, 79 , 84 S.Ct. 1594 , 12 L.Ed.2d 678 (1964), protects appellant from the use of his grand jury testimony in any state prosecution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While a witness must be given a meaningful opportunity to present his defense at a hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 1826, (citation omitted), this summary procedure does not require meaningless formalities that would only serve to delay the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(E) ven if he could point to some technical defect . . . , appellant obviously had actual notice of the charge against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.