Juszczyk v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
542 F.3d 626 · 2008
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Forney v. Apfel · Morales v. Apfel · Rita A. Hogan v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Ellis v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 32 (4th ed. Text Revision 2000), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale is used to report `the clinician's judgment of the individual's overall level of functioning.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.