Chaffer v. Prosper’s Empirical Analysis
542 F.3d 662 · 2008
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Carey Warden v. Saffold · 5 Cal. 4th 750 - In Re Clark · 5 Cal. 4th 813 - In Re Harris · Evans v. Chavis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“California law has not clarified whether a filing delay greater than 60 days necessarily qualifies as ‘substantial.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. Cate
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.