Scott v. TIAA-CREF

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2013

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2013-10-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2014

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

¶3UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

¶4Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. TIAA, No. 3:12-ev-00697-FDW, 2013 WL 2948315 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶5AFFIRMED.