Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 N.W.2d 519 - Riley v. Boxa

Riley v. Boxa’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2019

14 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Salsbury Laboratories v. Iowa Department of Environmental Quality · City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'n · Charles Gabus Ford, Inc. v. Iowa State Highway Commission · 81 Md. App. 301 - Magan v. Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society · Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appeals to the board of adjustment may be taken by any person aggrieved ... by any decision of the administrative officer. Such appeal shall be taken within a reasonable time as provided by the rules of the board by filing with the officer from whom the appeal is taken and with the board of adjustment a notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reverse, or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from and may make such order, requirement, decision, or determination as ought to be made, and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal is taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Two conditions must be met before we apply the doctrine: an adequate administrative remedy must exist for the claimed wrong, and the governing statutes must expressly or impliedly require the remedy to be exhausted before allowing judicial review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.