¶1Widner has appealed from a sentence imposed after remand by this court in Wid-ner v. State, 520 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The sentence is affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, as a condition of probation. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The sentence is in all other respects affirmed.
542 So. 2d 1068
542 So.2d 1068
14 Fla.L.Weekly 1224
Widner v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 16, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1989
1 state decisions
Relies on 538 So. 2d 545 - Courtesy Corp. v. Holland · 520 So. 2d 676 - Widner v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-05-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →