Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 So. 2d 237 - Layne v. State

542 So. 2d 237 - Layne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State (1994), Evans v. State (1997)

58 state decisions

2401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Barnes v. State · Weathersby v. State · United States v. Pelton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have made clear that we will not hesitate to reverse where the trial judge displays partiality, becomes an advocate, or, in any significant way, conveys to the jury the impression that he has sided with the prosecution.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 929 So. 2d 952 - Brent v. State · 784 So. 2d 884 - King v. State
  2. “whether the accused has been adequately warned, and whether, under the totality of the circumstances, he has voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Milliorn v. State · 726 So. 2d 1267 - Dobbs v. State
  3. “hard to imagine any reason why the officers would tell [the defendant] they would advise the district attorney of his cooperation other than to induce [him] to waive his rights and confess.... Such tactics in the course of custodial interrogation comes perilously close to infecting further prosecution of the accused with reversible error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 757 So. 2d 1027 - Mullins v. State · 722 So. 2d 1267 - Harper v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.